|
|
|
Forum Newbie
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 15/08/2007 14:07:36
Posts: 6,
Visits: 0
|
|
The new Lynx TV Commercial is pukey. The submissive man, who is a la Lynx, naked, acts like a cross between an ape, and a streaker. Why is it considered necessary, in order to sell a toiletry? Some of us have imaginations. The commercial itself, is dire. The worst one was, a bare backsided man, being ogled by a bimbo, again not needed, to advertise a toiletry. However The ASA, saw nothing wrong, oddly. Another one was, not preoccupied with bare flesh, in the same way, but had an aggressive bimbo, spraying a product, at a pretty boy. Somewhat thoughtless. It is Sods Law, that one seems to see more of this kind of thing, causing an immediate wish, to change channels.
All their commercials, use superficially good looking, white skinned people, implying, that no one else matters, and is entitled to buy their products, which are cheap, to use such pretensions. I notice, that women are never featured in the same lack of clothing, in commercials, or other entertainments. Somewhat sexist.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/04/2008 11:40:33
Posts: 35,
Visits: 219
|
|
| It's not the most PC ad i've ever seen, but sex sells.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 21/09/2008 12:28:48
Posts: 51,
Visits: 442
|
|
| Their adverts are clever but I do disagree with their content of all practically naked women and I do see the PC side of it. However may be this is why they are successful?
|
|
|
|